Saturday, May 31, 2014

Clerks Prep For Illinois' Gay Marriage Rollout

BELLEVILLE, Ill. (AP) — Sabra (SAY'-bruh) Blumhorst and Chelsea Baker exchanged wedding vows near their southern Illinois home last November, when Illinois didn't recognize same-sex marriages.



That all changes Sunday. June 1 marks the day counties must begin issuing same-sex marriage licenses under legislation signed into law late last year.



Gay couples and advocates will be marking the date with blessing ceremonies and group weddings. Several county clerks' offices will offer Sunday hours to issue licenses to those who don't want to wait for Monday morning.



A February federal court ruling in Chicago declared Illinois' original ban unconstitutional, clearing the way for some same-sex couples to marry. Sixteen counties since have been issuing same-sex marriage licenses.



from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1kcnYUR

via IFTTT

Illinois Shelving $100M Gift To Obama Library

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) — A plan to offer $100 million in tax dollars to lure Barack Obama's presidential library to Illinois is on the shelf, as lawmakers wrapped up their spring session without advancing the idea.



Democrats in the president's home state pushed the proposal to compete against rival bids from Hawaii and New York. But it faced opposition from Republicans wary of an expensive and precedent-setting gift — with no immediately identified funding source — for a mostly private endeavor when the state faces serious financial difficulties. Not all Democrats were on board either. Both the Democratic-controlled House and Senate adjourned without calling for any final votes on the measure.



"It wasn't clear that a state monetary incentive was necessary for a successful (library) proposal," said Rikeesha Phelon, a spokeswoman for Senate President John Cullerton, a Chicago Democrat.



Sponsors of the measure vowed to continue their advocacy, but the initiative now must wait despite a June 16 deadline for host proposals to Obama's library commission.



The state's influential House speaker, Michael Madigan, who doubles as state Democratic Party chairman, had hoped the library plan would be part of a multibillion-dollar replacement for a five-year statewide construction plan that is expiring. But that larger bricks-and-mortar program also got no traction as lawmakers patched together a 2015 state budget without extending a temporary income tax increase, as Democrats had sought.



Obama was a community organizer in Chicago before he was elected to the Illinois and U.S. Senates. He grew up in Hawaii and went to college in New York, spurring those states to compete for hosting Obama's legacy.



"In order to show him we're serious about wanting him in Illinois, we have to do the right thing," said Illinois state Rep. Monique Davis, a Chicago Democrat and Madigan's co-sponsor. "We must put forth some good-faith effort."



Even without approval of a capital plan, Davis wanted a vote before the House adjourned to send a supportive message ahead of the commission's application deadline. She said she will continue pushing the idea this fall when lawmakers return to Springfield.



Republicans say they welcome the library and the tourists it would attract. But they pointed out that no library dedicated to a modern president received state or federal tax dollars — although Democrats point out public assistance is often offered, such as donated land.



"Bush and Clinton both raised over $200 million in private funds to take care of their library," said Rep. Joe Sosnowksi, a Rockford Republican. Obama's "ability to raise that amount and more is without question. For us to chip in half of what a presidential library would cost is an abuse of the taxpayers."



Madigan cited as precedent the public funding of another presidential library — that of the Prairie State's other favored son, Abraham Lincoln. That $155 million Springfield showplace was financed with $115 million in state tax money and $32 million in federal dollars.



But Lincoln's repository is not an official presidential library maintained by the National Archives Record Administration, which has been devoted to presidential facilities beginning with Herbert Hoover.



George Washington's library at Mount Vernon in northern Virginia operates on private donations, spokeswoman Melissa Wood said, as does the Woodrow Wilson Presidential Library in Staunton, Virginia, according to library representative Robert Robinson. Like the Lincoln site, Robinson said the Calvin Coolidge library in Massachusetts is state-run.



___



The bill is HB6090.



Online: http://www.ilga.gov.



___



Contact John O'Connor at http://ift.tt/1j9behW



from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1pHih0B

via IFTTT

Patrick Kane Propels Blackhawks Into Game 7

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Patrick Kane managed just one assist in the first four games of the Western Conference finals. The Los Angeles Kings took all time and space away from Chicago's goal-scoring star while pushing the Blackhawks to the brink of elimination.



Chicago is still alive because Kane was still determined to find open ice, such as the patch near the painted Stanley Cup logo at Staples Center where he scored the goal that sent this thrilling series to Game 7. Kane set up Duncan Keith's tying goal with 8:26 left before scoring the winner with 3:45 to play, propelling the Blackhawks to a 4-3 victory over the Kings in Game 6 on Friday night.



Kane's career has been defined by his brilliance in the Blackhawks' biggest moments, and his tiebreaking goal will rank among the best. After barely touching the scoresheet early in the series, Kane has scored seven points in Chicago's consecutive dramatic victories, capped by his dangle for a seeing-eye goal past Jonathan Quick.



"I didn't see anything off the rush," Kane said. "I took it up the line and tried to get a shot through. I think (Andrew Shaw) was in front getting a great screen. Luckily, it went in."



The conference finals rematch between the NHL's last two champions will be decided in a winner-take-all Game 7 — the third of the postseason for the Kings, who are 6-0 in elimination games this spring. Chicago has won nine of its last 11 playoff elimination games heading home to the United Center on Sunday night.



The winner hosts the New York Rangers on Wednesday.



After trailing with less than nine minutes to play in Game 6, the defending Stanley Cup champion Blackhawks avoided elimination for the second straight game in an already memorable playoff series between two NHL powers at the top of their games. Chicago is heading home with a chance to advance thanks to the forward who saves his best for the brightest lights.



"It's amazing what he can do in these big games when our season is on the line," Chicago captain Jonathan Toews said about Kane. "Nobody else seems to be able to do it the same way he does. It's pretty amazing."



Both teams blew late leads in the third period, and Drew Doughty was primed to be Los Angeles' hero with a tying goal and a tiebreaking assist on Alec Martinez's score with 12:22 left. But after Kane took control, Corey Crawford came up with several late saves as Chicago hung on.



"There is the 'Wow' factor in this series, especially the last two games," Chicago coach Joel Quenneville said. "We've got two competitive teams that have experience in the situation. It's been amazing. I mean, as good as it gets."



Chicago trailed 3-1 in the conference finals after its second straight loss at Staples Center on Monday, but the Blackhawks prolonged the series with an epic double-overtime victory in Game 5.



Crawford, who made 26 saves, exchanged harsh words and contact with Quick after the second-period horn. Quick, who has yielded nine goals in the last two games, had just been hit by Shaw, Chicago's agitator.



Dwight King scored an early goal and Doughty played 26 minutes in another dynamic game for the Kings, who were half a period away from clinching their second trip to the Stanley Cup finals in three years.



"I'm frustrated, but I'm over it pretty quickly," Doughty said. "And we've got another game to play, Game 7. We've had two chances to close out this series, and we are not going to blow a third one."



Chicago led 2-1 entering the third after getting goals from Kane and Ben Smith early in the second period, and Staples Center echoed with worry until Doughty tied it with 14:28 left with a wrist shot past a screened Crawford for his third goal in four games.



Doughty then fed Martinez for a low shot through traffic, putting the Kings ahead 3-2 and setting off a deafening celebration. A few minutes later, it turned to silence when Keith and Kane beat Quick.



"We get the privilege of playing with a guy like that every day and seeing what he can do," Keith said of Kane. "You know when it comes down to crunch time, him and Johnny (Toews), I don't know if there are two other guys I'd rather have on my team."



But Kane was just one problem for Los Angeles' normally solid defense, which gave up numerous scoring chances.



"I feel like I'm a broken record here, but we've got to be sharp in our own end," Martinez said. "We weren't making plays that we normally make. We've got to be quick to contact on them. We weren't very sharp."



NOTES: The Blackhawks went with seven defensemen for Game 6, dressing Sheldon Brookbank for the first time since May 13. Kris Versteeg and Peter Regin were scratched. ... Kings owner Phil Anschutz made a rare appearance at Staples Center. Prospective new Clippers owner Steve Ballmer and point guard Chris Paul also attended the game.



from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/RPPNpu

via IFTTT

5 Things I Learned From Prom Photos On Facebook

Everyone knows that the cool kids have already fled Facebook en masse, vacating the building just as soon as their middle-aged parents occupied the social media space. So the prom photos that I saw were the censored ones, of course, the ones that parents posted to show how nicely their kids cleaned up and not a single one with a tongue misplaced. With that in mind, here's what I learned from the prom photos I saw:



1. Girls are still wearing uncomfortable heels but boys boldly sought the comfort of sneakers.

In more than one photo, boys got dressed up from the ankles up. When it came to footwear, they donned a pair of Converse high tops -- a fashion statement for sure, but I would have to conclude that by the end of the evening, it was the girls who were carrying their shoes while the boys were still able to wear theirs.



Lesson: We won't have true gender equality in the world until we can all wear comfortable footwear.



2. Some 16-year old-girls want to look 28.

I'm thinking of the one girl who looked smashing in what was basically a frontless gown that I think I've seen on a celebrity at a red carpet event. I almost didn't recognize the girl because, well, my eyes were diverted elsewhere. It's a mature look and she carried it well, but I had to wonder why. Her date was a kid from biology class, not "True Detective," and I kept wondering how straight she had to keep her back all night so that other parts would remain covered. I believe tape may have been invoked.



Lesson: You will all be 28 soon enough, girls, and when you are, you will wish you looked younger not older. Trust me on this one.



3. Wrist corsages appear to have totally replaced the ones you pinned on a girl's chest.

Hallelujah. Enough said.



I think this is a wonderful evolution of tradition because even if your date is trying to look 28, she is really still 16. And since you really only know her from biology and likely lack the finesse of Matthew McConaughey or Woody Harrelson, it's best that you keep your fumbling fingers on her wrist -- at least while her mother is shooting a photo of you during the corsage application portion of the ritual.



4. Parents-taking-photos-before-the-prom has been elevated to an art form.

In my community, the bulk of the prom-goers line up en masse at various ocean-view settings for a large group photo. I didn't see one girl-in-a-gown descending the stairs in her parents' home to admiring gasps and flashbulbs popping. I also didn't see any flashbulbs popping; maybe more than one tradition was lost here?



It's clear though that the pre-prom photography is an important part of the evening. Facebook lit up with the results and typically the comments were mournful "Where has the time flown?" and "I remember when they played together in the sandbox!" or "OMG -- how grownup they look!"



5. Pre-prom photos are the last purview belonging to parents.

After the photos, you watch them pile into a limo -- or worse yet, drive themselves off to the event and the post-prom events. The prom becomes symbolic for what's to come: They graduate high school, leave for college and continue on the one-way street toward adulthood where U-turns aren't allowed.



And what's left for parents? Posting the prom photos to Facebook.







from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1mVcdkw

via IFTTT

Friday, May 30, 2014

Slain Special Ed Teacher Another Innocent Victim Of Chicago's Gun Violence

A Chicago school community is devastated after a special ed teacher was killed while stopping in at her second job at a real estate office Thursday night.



Bullets from a suspected gang-related shooting tore through the wall of Dr. Betty Howard's real estate office in the city's Chatham neighborhood. At least one shot struck her head. Howard, who had stopped in to drop off paperwork, was pronounced dead at an area hospital less than an hour later, Fox Chicago reports.



Everyone who knew Howard is "devastated at the loss of their colleague and friend," said Chicago Teacher's Union President Karen Lewis.



Howard, 58, was remembered as a "life-changing educator" for her work at Gwendolyn Brooks College Prep Academy High School in the city's South Side Roseland neighborhood, CBS Chicago reports.



"Dr. Howard has been a member of our family for many years," Brooks principal D’Andre Weaver told CBS. "Her love for all children, but particularly children with diverse learning needs, was second to none.”



Howard's brother, Chicago Police Officer Orlando Long, described his sister as "a very happy person; was always smiling, and always laughing, and just full of joy.”



The Chicago Teachers Union, of which Howard was a member, released a statement from Lewis Friday:



“Our fallen sister brings to mind the loss that we all feel for every child and adult who lives in the city and is a victim of deadly violence. The seemingly random nature of this incident makes it all the more painful, and highlights the attention that must be given to neighborhoods where people face these tragedies on a daily basis.





Howard was among three people killed and 10 wounded in shootings citywide on Thursday.



In addition to teaching and working in real estate, Brooks was also the “first lady” of New Light Holiness Church where her husband, Rev. Major Howard serves as pastor. According to the Sun-Times, Brooks served as a case manager at the church, also organizing a tutoring program.



"She didn't deserve to die like this," Howard's neighbor, Odell Spencer, told the Tribune. “There is so much violence and I feel so helpless and it's innocent people getting killed all the time. Everybody knows Betty on this block as a really cheerful, thoughtful person. She will be missed."



Police have not arrested any suspects.



from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1pt6xkU

via IFTTT

You Must Read Stanford's Response To The Snapchat CEO's 'Demeaning' Emails

In an email Friday to the entire Stanford undergraduate community, University Provost John Etchemendy called a series of emails sent by Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel during his days at the college "crude, offensive, and demeaning to women."



Etchemendy wrote that the problem is not just that Spiegel sent the emails, but that other students read them and said nothing. He then urged students to always stand up against "crude or hateful language, and the attitudes that give rise to it."



That is the only way, he said, that the community as a whole will learn what is acceptable behavior and what is not.



Spiegel sent the NSFW emails, which were made public by Valleywag's Sam Biddle this week, to his fraternity brothers between 2009 and 2010. The emails are laced with misogynist language and attitudes. In them, Spiegel refers to women as "soroisluts" and encourages fraternity members to "have some girl put your large kappa sigma dick down her throat" as a reward for a successful weekend of partying.



Shortly after Valleywag published the emails, Spiegel issued a statement saying he was "mortified" by the contents of the emails."They in no way reflect who I am today or my views towards women," he added.



Here's Etchemendy's wonderful email in its entirety:



Dear Students,



I know many of you have seen a story that recently appeared on the Internet focusing on emails sent by a former Stanford student to fellow fraternity members and others while he was attending Stanford several years ago. Like most of you, male and female, I found those messages abhorrent. I am writing now to convey clearly that the sentiments expressed in these emails do not reflect what we, as members of the Stanford community, expect of one another.



I know the vast majority of you agree. In fact, the former student has issued a public statement expressing regret over the emails, calling them "idiotic" and saying that they "in no way reflect who I am today or my views toward women." I have no reason to doubt his statement or the sincerity of his regret. But that does not change the fact that the emails were sent. And in my mind, that raises a troubling question for the rest of us. Because the emails were also received, and no doubt received by others who found them crude, offensive, and demeaning to women -- others who had already matured enough to see them, in fact, as worse than "idiotic."



This is what concerns me most. We can choose to turn a blind eye to such statements and chalk them up to youthful indiscretion. Or we can be more courageous, and affirmatively reject such behavior whenever and wherever we see it, even -- no, especially -- if it comes from a friend, a classmate, or a colleague. Only if we choose the latter will we create the kind of university culture we can all be proud of, all of the time.



The author of those emails is not proud he sent them. The members of his fraternity are not proud to be associated with them. And the wider Stanford community is positively ashamed they were sent by one of our members.



But we are a learning community, and so I am writing to ask that we all learn something from this. There will always be members of the Stanford community who arrive here without the maturity to recognize the corrosive effect of crude or hateful language, and the attitudes that give rise to it, on a community like Stanford based on mutual respect.



So I am asking that each of us choose the more difficult path whenever we encounter such attitudes. It does not take many strong and vocal objections to communicate what we consider acceptable and what we do not. Members of our community should learn now, not many years from now, how abhorrent those attitudes are, whether real or feigned.



This is a good time to reflect on our common values and our obligations to one another as members of the Stanford community. As we approach the end of the academic year and, for the senior class, the end of the undergraduate experience, let us celebrate in ways that reflect our best selves. Let us strive to be role models in our interactions with others.



Finally, please know that Stanford resources are available to anyone who has concerns about the conduct of individuals or groups and the effect of that conduct on the rights of others. No student should have any aspect of his or her experience at Stanford compromised by conduct of others that violates university policy. Among the many resources available are the Title IX Coordinator, the Sexual Harassment Policy Office, the Office of Alcohol Policy and Education, the Sexual Assault and Relationship Abuse Office, Counseling and Psychological Services, and Residential Education. Never hesitate to contact any of these offices when you need it.



Sincerely,



John Etchemendy

Provost





from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1jBQw4m

via IFTTT

Julia Collins Wins 19th Consecutive Game Of 'Jeopardy!'

LOS ANGELES (AP) — "Jeopardy!" champion Julia Collins is keeping her winning streak alive.



The TV game show says Collins scored her 19th consecutive victory on Thursday's contest. That puts her in a second-place tie for most consecutive non-tournament wins. She shares the No. 2 spot with season 22 contestant David Madden. The top "Jeopardy!" player is Ken Jennings, who won 74 straight games in season 21 for a total of $2.5 million.



The 31-year-old Collins' latest victory pushed her cash prize total to $410,000.



The Chicago-area resident already has set another record: She's won more games and more money than any other female contestant.



Collins began taping her "Jeopardy!" appearances in January but remained mum about the outcome — although she did quit her business consultant job.



from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1oSAXux

via IFTTT

'Ferris Bueller' Glass House Sells For $1.06M

CHICAGO (AP) — The Chicago-area home where Ferris Bueller's friend Cameron famously "killed" his father's prized Ferrari finally has a new owner.



Crain's Chicago Business (http://bit.ly/1nyt5Bj ) reports that the modernist home in Highland Park sold Thursday for $1.06 million. Craig Hogan is regional director at Coldwell Banker Previews. He wouldn't say who bought the four-bedroom, steel-and-glass house built on the edge of a wooded ravine.



The house, built in 1953 by Mies van der Rohe-protege A. James Speyer, was first put on the market in 2009 listed at $2.3 million.



The sleek house was featured in John Hughes' 1986 film "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" as the home of Cameron Frye, played by Alan Ruck. After the Ferrari crashes through the glass into the ravine, Ferris tells Cameron: "You killed the car."



___



Information from: CRAIN'S CHICAGO BUSINESS.



from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1oSuAHH

via IFTTT

Reparations Could Be So Much More Than A Check In The Mail

CHICAGO -- Della King didn't know what she had missed until her husband revealed his most cherished boyhood memory: his parents cheering for him while he played little league baseball.



"[My parents] never showed up for sporting events because they always had to work; my parents had to pay the mortgage," King, 47, told The Huffington Post. "I never knew parents showed up for those things."



King's parents were members of the Contract Buyer's League, a group of black homeowners in Chicago's North Lawndale neighborhood. The group formed in 1968 to fight discriminatory real estate practices aimed at segregating America's post-war communities and driving African-American homeowners into predatory lending schemes.



Ethel Weatherspoon, King's mother, is among the league's surviving members, and was recently interviewed by Ta-Nehisi Coates for his powerful Atlantic cover story, "The Case For Reparations." The 16,000-word American history lesson argues that the United States has systematically robbed black Americans, and should now pay them back. While a common assumption is that reparations would address years of slavery, Coates also traces the lineage of slavery to Jim Crow and later, subtler forms of institutional racism, which ultimately shut off the prime route to middle-class wealth for many African Americans.



King said that she had never given much thought to the idea of reparations before accompanying her mother to Coates' interview. In hindsight, she now sees how her parents' struggle depleted not only their energy and their bank account but their ability to witness even the most average of childhood experiences -- like playing in baseball games.



"It's getting overwhelming now, thinking of all the things I missed," she said.



Weatherspoon, 74, told HuffPost she and her husband maintained a back-breaking work schedule to keep up with payments on their home. Like so many of their neighbors, the Weatherspoons were victims of "redlining," a federal housing practice that all but guaranteed middle-class, metro-dwelling black families would be unable to secure a normal loan. Instead, they were left with the wildly unstable option of buying a home from a contract seller, a practice that involved exorbitant fines and the threat that they'd lose the property entirely if they missed even a single payment.



"We managed to hang on [to our house] by cutting back on a lot of things [for our kids]," Weatherspoon told HuffPost, ticking off simple activities like drive-in movies and traveling sports leagues. "We couldn't afford them."



When asked what reparations might look like, Weatherspoon and King separately agreed that educational programs and loan forgiveness would be better than cash.



"It may have a good impact to give a certain type of education -- make sure that children are getting a quality education and having the right type of teachers," Weatherspoon said, adding that the right education would give people in her community access to good jobs, "ones that use computer skills."



Weatherspoon also envisions reparations in the form of well-run programs that include "social and mental therapy." The hope, she said, is that the measures would restore jobs to her community -- and optimism for the future.



"Sure, you can say, 'Hand me a few dollars,' and then in 10 years, you're back in the same place. Money can be good, but it has to be used in the right way," she said. "A person might need some social or mental therapy to get their mind back after they've been all frustrated and turned around, thinking there's no future."



King said the most meaningful way to restore what has been lost in the black community is to remove the largest hurdles to pursuing a good education: Loan forgiveness for college grads whose financial struggles have been compounded by discriminatory practices of the day, and financial assistance for teenagers so they can attend competitive high schools.



"I think it would definitely be appropriate for children to have help with their education -- secondary and higher education -- to make up for what we lost in our childhood," King said.



Like King and Weatherspoon, Clyde Ross, who figured prominently in Coates' story, said he thinks reparations should take the form of something community-based for the younger generation -- but not cash.



"Just a place where they can go, with a purpose," Ross said.



King, who now lives with her family in Streamwood, Illinois, about 30 miles northwest of her old neighborhood, said she would like to see reparations used to provide young people with basics, like a proper diet and community activities. She recalled the pride she felt on seeing her own son at school assemblies and enrolling her daughter in the Girl Scouts.



Coates notes in his piece that reparations for black Americans have long been considered a radical or fringe idea -- not because the idea is untenable, but because of the nation's unwillingness to discuss it.



"There needs to be something to make up for the loss that was incurred," King said. "But I don't know. From the perspective of where I'm standing, I don't see that changing. I don't know how we can start to change it. There's a great discussion happening on what's happening and how to save our children, and we don't know where to start."



"What has always been the case in American political history is that the election cycle is always shorter than you think it is, and Americans don't seem to be the type of people who want to dwell on issues for a while," said Luke Harlow, a historian of 19th century slavery and abolition, race and religion at the University of Tennessee. "We're more into detachment than engagement."



Harlow thinks a productive first step in addressing reparations would be to entertain HR40 -- a bill to study proposals for reparations that U.S. Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) has re-introduced to every Congress since 1989 -- an idea Coates strongly endorses.



"It'd be an important and valuable step, because it's a step that's never been taken and it's a good place to start," Harlow said.



Valerie Cooper, associate professor of Black Church Studies at Duke Divinity School, told The Huffington Post that reparations could ultimately restore the relationship between the country and its African-American citizens.



"Had the two parties involved simply been two friends, one of whom had wrecked the other's car, the need for restitution would be clear," Cooper said via email. "It wouldn't matter how many other times the car had been scratched, or even wrecked, or by whom. All that would matter is that the friendship has no hope of surviving if nothing is done, and only a chance of surviving if restitution is made."



from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1kpUayv

via IFTTT

A Brief History Of The 'LA Clippies' Joke

Former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has agreed to buy the Los Angeles Clippers for a whopping $2 billion, and everyone is making the exact same joke.



You see, the inventor of the Microsoft Office paperclip assistant Clippy wants to buy the Los Angeles Clippers. Get it? This woman does:








And so does this guy:










SiriusXM certainly gets it:










And Pete won't let a good Clippy joke get by him:










LOL, good one Gary.










ROFL, Jacob.










Even our lovable boss, Emily, got in on the joke.










But then, people started to notice that there were a lot of Clippy jokes out there...

















...and the Clippy jokes got snippy.










Suddenly, people were calling for Twitter reform.










Threats ensued.










The government decided to intervene.










And we all realized we'd been laughing at this joke for too long.










Far too long.










We wanted to believe it was over, but it was not.










Please Twitter, we beg of you: Let it go.










from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1wAt4OW

via IFTTT

School's Out for the Summer!

2014-05-29-SchoolExterior.jpg





The opening of The School, a new arts space in Kinderhook, New York, by Jack Shainman Gallery







This past Saturday, the teeny-tiny town of Kinderhook, New York, located three hours north of New York City by car, was invaded by hundreds of New Yorkers dressed in their blackest finery for the opening of Jack Shainman Gallery's The School. What they found upon arrival was a three-story, 30,000-square-foot Federal Revival building dating from 1929, the former Martin van Buren High School, that in the past few years had been radically transformed to accommodate the presentation of contemporary art works. The transformation, under the direction of noted Spanish architect Antonio Jimenez Torrecillas, is a subtle triumph. The school was redesigned to include a large exhibition space with soaring 24-foot ceilings -- formerly the gymnasium--accompanied by traditional gallery spaces on the second floor -- transformed classrooms.





2014-05-29-SchoolInterior.jpg





On view at The School, works by Nick Cave







The School opened with an exhibition and performance by Nick Cave, the noted Chicago-based and globally renowned sculptor, dancer, and performance artist, best known for his Soundsuits -- wearable fabric sculptures that are bright and whimsical, and sometimes take on otherworldly and Afro-Futurist sensibilities. The costumed dance performance staged in front of The School left us all wanting more, and so we followed the dancers as they made their way to huge tented areas in the back of the building, for photo ops and dancing, dining, and libations. A superb day in the country, for sure, but moreover an inspiring example of how artists and their presenters can take on places and spaces discarded by society and repurpose them wonderfully for new cultural practice.



Kinderhook alone is well worth the visit. It's a gorgeous little town that was settled in the 17th century -- and now it has a stunning exhibition space. Make a date to visit.



The School - Jack Shainman Gallery

25 Broad Street, Kinderhook, NY 12106

T. 212-645-1701

Gallery hours: Saturdays from 11am-5pm (through mid-August) and by appointment.

Info: http://ift.tt/1iA5AzZ





From a performance work by artist Nick Cave, at The School





2014-05-29-SchoolPerformance.jpg





from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1iA5BUo

via IFTTT

23 Full-Sized Struggles Every Short Woman Wants You To Know About

Women come in all different shapes and sizes, and while the average height of an American female is around 5 feet 4 inches, many much-shorter females only dream of being that tall.



Yes, there are perks to being a very short gal (rocking high heels, taking advantage of child fares, etc). But there are also some painfully awkward and downright annoying realities that we, the petite women of the world, face every single day.



Here are 23 daily stressors those tall folk will never understand:



1. Annoyingly hung bathroom mirrors are your worst nightmare.







Time to bring out the step-stool.



2. "How tall are you?" is the first question people ask you when they meet you.

Whatever happened to, "Nice to meet you??"



3. You then receive shocked looks when you reveal your height.

There are small people in this world. This is nothing new, folks.



4. The top shelves in your kitchen are untouched territory.



Short girl problems





5. People always ask how small your feet are.

This is especially annoying when we don't even have small feet.



6. Bartenders stare you down and scrutinize your ID for a solid five minutes.







All of your friends got into the bar ten minutes ago...



7. You still look like you're in high school, years after graduating from college.

People find it very hard to believe that you are past your tween years.



8. People dismiss your body insecurities with a, "But you're so tiny!"







Yes, we're petite -- but we can still be self-conscious about our figures, just like everyone else.



9. Pants.







You either have to cuff them, hem them or just give up on them completely.



10. This question: "Where do you shop for clothing in your size -- the kids' section?"

Yes, we do shop in the kids' section sometimes. And we save a lot of money.



11. You often see clothing items in stores you want to buy... but they don't carry it in petite.

It just isn't fair.



12. People decide to pick you up without your permission.







13. Or they pat you on the head.







We are not children.



14. CONCERTS.

Get ready to spend a lot of time jumping or staring at the back of peoples' necks. Oh, and someone will always ask you if you want to be put on their shoulders. No, thank you.



16. Related: Someone's head is always blocking your view at the movies.

Sometimes you feel like you should just sit in the front row.



15. You kind of have to stretch to reach the gas pedal.



#3



The struggle is very real.



17. People ask if you could technically qualify as a "midget."

Which is usually followed with, "So could you get a handicapped parking spot?"



18. Everyone thinks your head is an armrest.



#10

While it may seem convenient for you, we'd rather not be treated as objects.



19. Someone bumps into you with their hipbone when you're walking on the street.

They often proceed to yell at you and tell you to "watch where you're going." But shouldn't they also look down?



20. Subway rush hour means being wedged underneath some random dude's armpit.

The smell is just wonderful down here.



21. When tall people's arms go up (to grasp a subway pole, high-five a friend, put on a jacket...) they inevitably come down on your head.

Yup, that's a person your elbow just landed on.



22. Turnstiles meant to hit at the waist are basically steel beams aimed at your chest.

Ouch.



23. Some people think it's okay to talk to you like this:







It's not.



from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1wAhC5O

via IFTTT

WATCH: These Profound Images Are For Anyone Who's Ever Felt Invisible

Chinese artist Liu Bolin can disappear into everything from famous landmarks to the rows of instant noodles at the supermarket. The question is: Why? By going invisible, what does he help you see?



We want to know what you think. Join the discussion by posting a comment below or tweeting #TEDWeekends. Interested in blogging for a future edition of TED Weekends? Email us at tedweekends@huffingtonpost.com.





from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1jB8rrY

via IFTTT

Quintana wins mountain time trial, extends lead

Nairo Quintana wins 19th stage mountain time trial to extend Giro lead; Aru moves into top 3



from USATODAY.com Feed http://ift.tt/1oCUhyq

via IFTTT

International Mr. Leather and the Conflict of Exclusivity Within the LGBT Community (NSFW)

2014-05-29-EricBarryFullDisclosureDildo.JPG





This past weekend I attended International Mr. Leather, one of the biggest leather and fetish events in the world, held every year in downtown Chicago. I was in attendance both as a member of the media and as curious spectator. IML had granted me media passes for Full Disclosure, the sex-positive podcast I host, meaning I was granted a lot "behind the scenes" access to events.



If you've never been to IML, it's a four-day long event that features kink-friendly parties and social gatherings, culminating in a beauty pageant-esque competition of leather title holders from across the world to be International Mr. Leather.



2014-05-29-imlkenmelvoinbergericbarry.JPG





Much like the leather community in general, IML is overwhelmingly represented by gay males. While leather fetishes are by no means exclusive to gay men, the amount of women I encountered at the event could more or less be counted on two hands, as compared to the thousands of men I saw.



But the more time that I spent at the event, the more I had to question whether or not the ratio of men to women I saw was truly representative of those within the leather community, or whether or not there was some sort of institutionalized segregation of women.



The majority of the events at IML were headquartered at the Marriot's downtown Chicago location. Security was positioned at every entrance to the hotel along with signs that warned any passerby that the hotel was closed for a private event. As many of us stepped outside during the weekend to use our cellphones, at no point did I ever see security stop a man, be he dressed in a leather harness, t-shirt or peacoat.



But I did very clearly see security stop a woman, admonishing her that this was a private adult event taking place.



"Yeah, I know. That's exactly what I'm here for," she replied.



2014-05-29-IMLanimaldildos2.JPG







Most of the debauchery doesn't take place at the IML-sponsored events, but rather in the private hotel rooms of guests at the Marriot. While some of the parties I was invited to were private, closed-door events, others literally had an open door policy, allowing people to wander in and out of the room freely.



I was with my female friend at the time when we were invited to one such party on the 46th floor (the top floor) in a massive suite. Upon entering we found encompassed in near complete darkness, illuminated only by the glow of the city night's lights which the room overlooked. It was also exceptionally humid -- I'd estimate there were about 150 bodies crammed into the suite, doing pretty much everything your imagination will let you.



But despite the relative anonymity that darkness afforded, it only took five minutes before my friend was asked to leave.



"You can't be here. You're a woman," she was told.



My friend is a naturally shy and reserved person who's recently expressed an interest in the kink and BDSM community. While IML seemed like an opportune time to explore these interests, she was nervous about doing so -- intimidation, internal struggle and fear of rejection are frequent barriers when it comes to people openly exploring their own sexuality.



I stepped in, approaching the man who was kicking her out. It was unclear whether this man was the actual tenant of the suite or one of the hundred-plus strangers who had entered into the room and felt threatened by the presence of a woman.



"She's not causing any trouble. She's with me," I said.



"This is a party for men. Women aren't allowed," he retorted.



"We'll leave. But I'm just curious -- how do you define a man?"



"Someone who's obviously a man."



"What about gender queer people? What about trans people? What about femme men?"



"This isn't a party for trans people or anything in between, it's a party for men."



As we left, several men inside the room apologized on behalf of the man who had kicked her out, and several outside the room refused to go in as a result of it. It was clear that in this particular instance, the presence of my female friend was not upsetting to most of the men who noticed her. Still, it was a private party, and if the tenant of the suite didn't want a guest in their room they had every right to ask someone to leave.



But a conflict exists in the leather scene and within the LGBT community as a whole: How do groups that have traditionally been marginalized create a safe-space for themselves without simultaneously enacting the same exclusionary policies they've been fighting against?



The man who kicked my friend out of the party said that only people who were "obviously men" were allowed inside. How was he defining what makes an "obvious man" and how was he planning to enforce it? Was he proposing a gender police that went around examining the genitals of the attendees? As our country is making phenomenal strides in the fight for LGBT rights and understanding of queer identity, to proceed with a policy of stringent gender binary seems exceptionally dangerous.



"Misogyny is a real part of the gay community, and it's really exemplified within the gay leather community. It's always been a problem for those of us who don't adhere to binary sexual orientation dichotomies," said queer-identifying dominatrix Miss Erin Black.



Black goes on, "In male culture as a whole, if you're not worthy of being fucked, you're not worthy of much."



It's a conflict that's rearing its head more and more as the fight for LGBT inclusion progresses. Most queer individuals have spent their entire lives trying to assimilate to heteronormative culture. What happens when suddenly a queer individual has straight friends that are willing to accompany them to a gay bar for a change? Are queer people "allowed" to socialize with their straight ally friends?



We are at a pivotal moment in history in the struggle for equal representation and protection under the law. It's a time when unity, inclusion, and understanding are paramount.



"I believe anyone is allowed to define the terms of their gatherings in any way they want. But those terms aren't immune to critique. What makes a space safe for one person may make it unsafe for another. In defining 'safe space' we must get crystal clear on what defines safety and for whom," said feminist author and queer-identifying sex educator Allison Moon.



What happens to my friend who was kicked out of the party? What message does it send to potential allies both outside and within the LGBT community that your place within that community is directly related to your gender, sexuality, or what's between your legs?



Right now we need people like my friend.



Moon continues, "Solidarity isn't about genitals, it's about how we move through the world, how we experience discrimination, and how we support one another."



_____







For more from Eric Barry, follow him on Twitter or Facebook, and be sure to listen to the Full Disclosure sex podcast. This week's episode features IML 2013 winner Andy Cross, International Mr. Leather and bad rap lyrics.



from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1kptb5T

via IFTTT

'Star Wars' Museum Could Be Chicago's Next Big Attraction

CHICAGO (AP) — Mayor Rahm Emanuel is using everything but Jedi mind tricks to persuade "Star Wars" creator George Lucas to put his planned museum of art and movie memorabilia in Chicago.



Lucas has been talking to San Francisco about a location. At first blush, the West Coast bid seems obvious. It's Lucas' hometown. It's a premier center of technology and innovation, and it's closer to the nation's movie-making heartland. San Francisco Mayor Edwin Lee on Thursday sent Lucas a letter offering the museum a spot on the city's scenic waterfront. Emanuel, a former White House chief of staff, is known for going after big amenities that can burnish Chicago's global reputation (he's currently pushing for President Barack Obama's presidential library), and he sees himself as the city's salesman-in-chief.



But what can Chicago offer in the war for the Lucas Cultural Arts Museum? Here are five things to know about Chicago's bid:



HEY, CHEWIE. MEET DA BEARS



The city is offering up a slice of real estate along the Lake Michigan shorefront and near other big attractions such as the Shedd Aquarium. The site is currently a parking lot south of Soldier Field, meaning fans dressed up as Chewbacca and Darth Vader might have to cross paths with rowdy Bears tailgaters.



IS EMANUEL BEING PLAYED?



All good negotiators know you need to play one side against another. And assertions by local news outlets that Chicago is or was a front-runner may have helped wrest a better deal out of San Francisco, which rejected Lucas' first choice of a location near the Golden Gate Bridge. Lee has acknowledged his city wasn't a shoo-in but said he wouldn't easily give up the fight.



Either way, Emanuel stands to gain, if only from the publicity that comes with contending for big-time attractions and events.



THE SECOND CITY IS LUCAS' 'SECOND HOME'



Lucas feels an affinity for Chicago, where he has spent a lot of time, since his wife, prominent businesswoman Mellody Hobson, is from the city. Chicago closed down Promontory Point on the lakefront so the couple could host a star-studded party to celebrate after their California wedding. In a statement welcoming Chicago's bid, Lucas even called it his "second home."



THIS MAY — OR MAY NOT — BE THE CITY YOU'RE LOOKING FOR



Emanuel's Chicago fancies itself a big-league center of high-tech and innovation, and it does have some street cred there, with companies such as Boeing and sensations including Groupon. And while the San Francisco area can boast companies including Apple and Google, Lucas spokesman David Perry has praised Chicago for the attention it lavishes on culture, architecture, innovation and education — some of the lofty themes the museum will seek to promote.



WHAT CHICAGOANS SAY



Some of Chicago's most important civic leaders are behind the push to bring the museum. Emanuel has enlisted a task force with the likes of architect Jeanne Gang and Walter Massey, president of the School of the Art Institute of Chicago.



But not everyone is so keen. Northwestern University English professor Bill Savage, in a column this week for Crain's Chicago Business, suggested the museum would be a glorified holding tank for movie props better suited to Las Vegas.



from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1mQDrsP

via IFTTT

Texas court denies Armstrong appeal

Texas Supreme Court denies appeal by Lance Armstrong to block $12M lawsuit



from USATODAY.com Feed http://ift.tt/1kcBRRS

via IFTTT

What Old-Timey Job Is Perfect For You? Take Our Quiz To Find Out

Traveling back in time sounds fun and all, but there's one, er, reality that Hollywood movies seem to forget: Your ass would still have to get a job.



Fortunately for the aspiring time travelers among us, there were some pretty sweet gigs if you did get back to the 19th century or whatever. We're talking ice cutters and funeral clowns, people. (Note: If you go back in time, don't get a job as the groom of the stool or a urinatore.)



So just in case you're befriended by a zany scientist who wants to toss you back in time, we've created a quiz to figure out exactly what job you need to get once there.





Quiz widget by








from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/SY0982

via IFTTT

Savoldelli banned for seeing Armstrong's physician

2-time Giro champion Paolo Savoldelli banned 6 months for visiting with banned physician



from USATODAY.com Feed http://ift.tt/1jAtE59

via IFTTT

12 Unfortunate Restaurant Truths That Will Make You Think Twice About Eating Out

We all love going out to eat. Whether restaurant outings are an everyday event or only for special occasions, sitting down and being served (hopefully) delicious food and drinks is one of society's great pastimes. But if you've ever felt duped by a menu or ripped off when the check comes, that's because you probably have been.



Restaurants are businesses and their goal is, quite obviously, to make money. How much they make can vary greatly, depending on a number of different factors. As Amanda Cohen, the chef at New York City's Dirt Candy explained to Eater, "The price of ingredients barely enters into [the cost of a dish]. ... You're not paying $21 for your broccoli dogs, you're paying $21 to rent your table; I just trick you into thinking you're paying for the broccoli dogs because that's the accepted convention. 76% of that dish is actually paying for the A/C, my line cook's unemployment insurance, the gas and electricity. The toilet paper."



But some deals are better than others, and there are smarter choices you can make at a restaurant to get the best value and overall experience. Here are 13 things to remember the next time you go out to eat. They'll help you save money and maybe just have the best meal ever.



We'll start with a sad truth about one of our favorite appetizers: Guacamole is a huge ripoff.



guac



While avocados are one of the pricier fruits, the amount some restaurants charge for their "best" guacamole recipe is insane. According to Forbes, restaurants pay about fifty cents to a dollar for a single avocado. You pay about the same price for one in the grocery store, but some restaurants think they can charge you up to $14 for a bowl of mashed avocados and cheap spices and vegetables, because their "authenticity" gives the dish "value" -- and because you love guacamole and are willing to pay through the nose for it. While you know you're always going to be paying more for restaurant food than grocery food, the markup on guacamole is specifically glaring. A few restaurants in New York City are particular fans of this con. Grubstreet reports that both Rosa Mexicano and Dos Caminos charge $14 for a single bowl.





Speaking of bad deals on appetizers: edamame.



Most Japanese restaurants pay about two dollars for a whole pound of edamame. To prepare your appetizer, they take some out, steam them and add some simple salt to the dish. In the end, you may end up getting charged up to eight dollars for some beans. A nice profit for the restaurant, a bad value for you.





In fact, appetizers are generally some of the worst values for your dollar.



For the most blatant examples of ridiculous price inflation on menus, simply compare the prices of appetizers and main dishes. Our brains are easily duped when scanning a menu. There is a stark fluctuation in prices between an appetizer and entree dish that include the exact same ingredients. Jody Pennette, the founder of CB5 Restaurant Group, revealed to Forbes that restaurants have been raising the prices of appetizers "disproportionately to the increase in food costs" over the past 15 years. Restaurants get away with this because customers "form their perceptions of value by looking at the price of entrees." That explains why you'll get a $7 order of edamame and not complain when you follow it up with a $14 tuna roll.





You're almost always losing money when you choose pasta over a meat-centric dish.



steak



That's because it takes more labor and a wider variety of ingredients to make the dish with meat and accompaniments. Cooking up a basic pasta dish only takes a restaurant chef about twenty minutes, and they don't even use that many ingredients. The only time diners could be getting their money's worth is when they order an elaborate veggie-filled pasta dish. One chef told The San Francisco Chronicle that a properly made vegetarian pasta could be "surprisingly expensive" if the chef uses "seasonal and local farm fresh vegetables." And since diners expect pasta dishes to be on the lower-priced side, the restaurant feels it must keep the price of a pasta made with just vegetables at the same range as the other pasta dishes. Most of the time, chefs break even on those specific pastas.



But in general, Clark Wolf, a restaurant consultant in New York, told Forbes that diners most interested in value would be smart to choose "labor-intensive, time-consuming, complex dishes, that call for hard-to-find ingredients." Here's the rule: If the dish you're ordering seems like something you could easily whip up in your own kitchen for a lot cheaper than you're paying at a restaurant, you're most likely getting duped.





Before you think about that "special" entree, know this: Chefs are playing some serious mind games with those enticing dishes.



One of the first things you hear once you sit down at a restaurant could be one of the biggest scams. According to Sarah Zorn, the editorial director of the blog "Restaurant Girl," specials are just an expensive way for the chef to clean out his or her kitchen of leftovers. There's also a health issue to consider when you think about ordering the special: Dr. Oz reports that because the ingredients tend to be ones the chef needs to get rid of while still trying to make a profit, the dish will often include "aging meat and fish, old veggies and leftover sauces." The safest bet is to pick a signature dish that you know the restaurant always needs (hopefully) fresh ingredients for.





Brunch may be fun, but you might be getting cheated on those omelets and Benedicts.



eggs



We hope you have tons of fun going to brunch, because you're paying way too much for the meal itself. Almost everything on the brunch menu, from eggs to potatoes to sausage and bacon, is extremely inexpensive to purchase. Think about it: Eggs retail for ten cents a piece, yet order two eggs and toast at a restaurant and you're paying at least $4 dollars. Not cool. If getting a bang for your buck is your primary concern, your best bet is a dish that has an expensive meat or fish component, such as steak and eggs. Thankfully, the New York Times has just reported that many restaurants in the Big Apple are paying extra special attention to making elaborate brunch dishes. That could make some New Yorkers feel better about splurging on brunch.





And you're not off the hook if you order pancakes.



Forbes claims that the kitchen crew at restaurants gets "the last laugh" when people order the pancake dish at brunch. During brunch (which is usually busy), pancakes are one of the cheapest and easiest dishes to make: Mix up some eggs, flour and milk and throw them on a griddle for a few minutes until they cook. And you've probably spent more than $10 on a plate of pancakes a few times in your life. Make sure to eat every single piece of fresh fruit that comes on that plate -- they're probably the most expensive items.





No matter what meal you're eating, side dishes are bad deals. That's why vegetarians have it worst when it comes to fair prices.



vegetarian



Because vegetarians are often left with few meat-free options, they frequently turn to overpriced side dishes to fill them up. For example, restaurants will sometimes charge $5 or more for a baked potato or a side of fries, when the average cost of that dish is 65 cents. There's a reason restaurants price these sides and small items so high, and it's not just about making as much money as possible. The Wall Street Journal writes, "Straying outside a certain price range can be risky for a restaurant. A $3 soup on a menu where most appetizers are in the $8 to $12 range will either cause a run on the soup, or scare people away because they think something is wrong with it."





And it just gets worse for vegetarians: Some chefs have 'fessed up that their advertised "vegetarian" dishes aren't always meat-free.



While we would like to think this doesn't happen a lot, in a Food Network survey, 15 percent of chefs said the vegetarian dishes on the menu might not be completely vegetarian. One chef said he even saw a cook pour lamb's blood in a vegan person's pasta primavera.





Pescatarians aren't safe either: Some of the fish you're eating in a restaurant isn't the kind you think you're eating.



Think about all of the times you've browsed a menu at a swanky restaurant and seen "Chilean sea bass" under the entree section alongside an outrageous price tag and thought, "Wow, that's some fancy fish." And if you ordered it, it probably looked like this:



Chilean Sea Bass



Well, "Chilean sea bass" is not a even technically a bass. It's this menacing looking cod called the Patagonian Toothfish. And it looks like this:



123521454



Restaurants changed the name of the fish because "Patagonian Toothfish" sounded so scary. And the Chilean sea bass isn't the only deceptively named fish: As populations of Atlantic and Pacific fish like halibut, sole and flounder have dwindled in recent decades, restaurants have taken more common fish and replaced their unappetizing names with made-up and exotic-sounding monikers. The slimehead fish, another cod fish, named for its "distinctive mucus canals," now appears on menus as "orange roughy."



Even more, in 2012, ocean conservation group Oceana released a nationwide report that tested the authenticity of fish samples from 674 restaurants in 21 states, including New York, California and Florida. It concluded that 33 percent of the 1,215 fish samples they collected were mislabeled. A couple of startling findings: Only seven out of the 120 red snapper samples were actually red snapper, and 84 percent of "white tuna" -- (which is really albacore or toro) samples were actually escolar, a totally different fish that is not even in the tuna family and is notorious for causing gastrointestinal problems in some people. Restaurants most likely use escolar in place of white tuna because it's cheaper.





If you're looking for value on fish, don't even think about getting salmon.



Salmon shouldn't be billed as a fancy dish. In fact, it's much cheaper than what you're paying for it, and sometimes, restaurants are telling lies when the menu claims the salmon is "wild-caught." The University of Washington Tacoma ran a study in 2011 and found that 38 percent of salmon samples from restaurants in the Tacoma area were promoting Atlantic farm-raised salmon as wild-caught Pacific salmon. Most of the salmon lies occurred at inexpensive sushi and teriyaki places, and while it's hard for the customer to tell the difference between farm-raised Atlantic and wild-caught Pacific salmon when the fish is cut up or cooked, Erica Cline, one of the study's leaders, said responsible restaurant chefs should be able to tell the difference by "the feel of the fish and its oil content."





And if you need a drink with dinner to get over these unfortunate truths, make sure to go for quantity.



wine



It helps if you have a decently sized party to share with. All wine and beer is seriously marked up at restaurants, but if you're considering a glass of wine with your meal and you want to get the best deal, you should almost always buy the entire bottle. Joe Campanale, the beverage director for a number of restaurants in New York, including L'Artusi, Anfora and L'Apicio, told Zagat that while each restaurant in the industry varies on the amount they mark up a glass of wine, the "industry standard" is to "charge for a glass what the restaurant pays for the bottle."



Juliet Chung reveals in the Wall Street Journal that how much a restaurant marks up a bottle and a glass of wine depends on how expensive the wine was when the restaurant bought it at wholesale price. For example, an inexpensive bottle of wine may get marked up three to four times its wholesale price, while a pricier bottle could only get marked up one or two times its price. But overall, if you are looking to "maximize the value per ounce," you may be better off opting to invest in a more expensive bottle over a severely overpriced glass of mediocre wine.



We apologize for being a Debbie Downer, but ... WOMP WOMP







from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1oR06pw

via IFTTT

Thursday, May 29, 2014

House Tells DEA To Leave State Hemp Programs Alone

WASHINGTON -- House members early Friday blocked the Drug Enforcement Administration from using funds to interfere in state-legal industrial hemp research, a rebuke to the agency less than a month after it seized hemp seeds intended for Kentucky's pilot program.



Two hemp-related amendments to a DEA funding bill introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-Ore.) prohibit the Department of Justice, including the DEA, from blocking states' importation of hemp seeds, and from preventing states from implementing laws authorizing industrial hemp activities made legal under this year's federal farm bill.



Massie’s amendment passed 246-162, and Bonamici’s was approved 237-170. The Senate will likely consider its own appropriations bill for the DEA and Justice Department, and the House amendments would have to survive a joint conference before going into effect.



"The DEA has more important things to do than interfere with legal activities at the state level," Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) said. "We need to remove the cloud of uncertainty,"



Massie said Kentucky was forced into a "waste of time and money and the court system's limited resources" during a legal battle with the DEA over its hemp seeds this month. “The DEA is not above Congress, it’s not above the law,” Massie added. “This amendment simply asks the DEA to follow existing laws.”



"Farmers are unable to get the seed they need in order to grow their legal crop," said Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.). "It's really hard to grow industrial hemp, and the DEA without any clear reason, any argument, any sense, throws itself down as a roadblock to success."



But Reps. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and Frank Wolf (R-Va.) opposed the hemp seed amendment.



“If you take the DEA out of the process, you’re going to have a situation where this law will be honored in name only and not used for the purpose it is intended, which is research,” Goodlatte said. “You cannot determine the THC limits of cannabis plants simply by looking at them. They need to be examined. The DEA fulfills that role.”



Fifteen states have legalized industrial hemp production, and about two dozen others have introduced legislation that would authorize research, set up a regulatory framework or legalize the growing of industrial hemp.



As Kentucky prepared to launch its hemp-growing project, the DEA seized 250-pound shipment of industrial hemp seeds at the Louisville airport this month. Kentucky sued the DEA for seeds' release and took possession a week later after obtaining a DEA permit.



The DEA action incensed Democratic and Republican lawmakers involved in the new industrial hemp laws, and was condemned by Kentucky Agriculture Commissioner James Comer, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), his Democratic challenger Alison Lundergan Grimes, Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).



Hemp is the same plant species as marijuana -- cannabis sativa -- but it contains little to no THC, the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana associated with the "high" sensation.



Hemp, sometimes called marijuana's "sober cousin," has a long history in America and has been used in a wide range of household products, including paper, cosmetics and textiles. In the 1700s, American colonial farmers were required by law to grow the plant, and it was used for hundreds of years in the U.S. to make rope and lamp oil.



American hemp production peaked in 1943, with more than 150 million pounds from 146,200 harvested acres. Production dropped to zero in the late-1950s as a result of rising anti-drug sentiment and competition from synthetic fibers.





from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1nIZFOs

via IFTTT

Man Convicted Of Small-Town Murders That Frightened People Into Staying Indoors

ROCK ISLAND, Ill. (AP) — A man serving life sentences for two killings was convicted Thursday in the deaths of four others who were fatally beaten with a hammer in a northwest Illinois apartment.



After a little over three hours of deliberations, jurors found Nicholas Sheley, 34, guilty of murder in the deaths of 29-year-old Brock Branson; 20-year-old Kilynna Blake; her son, 2-year-old Dayan; and 25-year-old Kenneth Ulve in Rock Falls in June 2008. The killings were part of a series of crimes authorities say Sheley committed in the summer of 2008, stretching from his hometown of Sterling, Illinois, south to St. Louis. Sheley already is serving life sentences for the deaths of two Illinois men that June. He is due to be tried next in Missouri for the deaths of an Arkansas couple.



Police say the violence was fueled by alcohol and drugs. Prosecutors say he believed Branson was having an affair with his then-wife, Holly Sheley.



Sheley rocked back and forth in his chair as Judge Jeffrey O'Connor read the verdicts. Family members of the victims sobbed, wiped away tears and exchanged hugs to the judge's words.



"I hope you rot in hell, Nick Sheley," Jodi Fitzgerald, sister of Brock Branson, screamed as Sheley was led from the courtroom.



The killings in Rock Falls shook the town of about 9,200 residents hard. Local officials have said that after the four were found dead in their apartment, many people in town were afraid to go outside for days.



An autopsy showed all four were killed by multiple blows from a hammer.



"Nicholas Sheley did this. Nicholas Sheley is the one responsible for these murders," Assistant Attorney General Steve Nate said during his final argument. "Nicholas Sheley killed Brock. He killed Ki. He killed Dayan. And he killed Kenny."



The prosecution's case focused heavily on the Sheley's DNA, which experts said was found in the apartment. Prosecutors also showed images of Sheley taken from security cameras in the days following the killings in which he wore clothing belonging to one of the victims.



Holly Sheley testified that on the night of the killings, the two of them had sex in a pickup truck whose cab was thick with blood. Holly Sheley did not give this information to police until her DNA was found in the truck much later. She was offered immunity for her testimony.



Nicholas Sheley's attorney, Jeremy Karlin of Galesburg, did not call any witnesses. He has represented Sheley in all of his trials so far. As Sheley has done in the past, he tried unsuccessfully to represent himself in this trial.



The Rock Falls slayings happened just a few days after a previous Sheley victim, 93-year-old Russell Reed, was discovered in the trunk of his car in Sterling, just across the Rock River about 110 miles west of Chicago.



Police said Sheley killed Reed on June 23 as he searched for money to buy cocaine. Five days later, he allegedly killed 65-year-old Ronald Randall in Galesburg and stole his truck — the same vehicle his ex-wife referenced in her testimony. Sheley has been convicted in both of those deaths.



Sentencing in the Rock Falls killings is set for Aug. 11. Illinois does not have the death penalty.



He next faces trial in the deaths of Jill and Tom Estes, a Sherwood, Arkansas, couple who were traveling in Missouri, where prosecutors can pursue the death penalty.



Sheley was arrested on July 1, 2008, outside a bar in Granite City, Illinois, just a few miles east of St. Louis.



from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1mNmxv5

via IFTTT

House Gives A Raise To DEA As Congressman Asks Why

WASHINGTON -- Members of the House of Representatives from both parties took aim at the Drug Enforcement Administration on Thursday, even as the House voted to give the agency $35 million more than it requested.



Members from both parties were set to offer amendments on an appropriations bill that would restrict the DEA from obstructing state industrial hemp programs, and from cracking down on medical marijuana facilities. As of Thursday evening, the only amendment that would have curbed DEA spending was defeated by a vote of 339-66. The amendment by Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.) would have reduced DEA's budget by $35 million, to the amount of the agency's original request.



"What has the DEA done to deserve a $35 million raise?" Polis asked on the House floor Thursday afternoon. "Why are we singling out the DEA to receive funds above what the DEA itself requested in the president's budget? The DEA has demonstrated time and time again that it can't efficiently manage the resources it already has. It's diverting funds to ridiculous things like impounding industrial hemp seeds, which have no narcotic content, intimidating legal marijuana businesses in states like mine, wasting money on marijuana infractions that are legal in states where they occur."



Polis called DEA chief Michele Leonhart "a terrible agency head" who has embarrassed herself and her agency.



But the DEA has a strong defender in Rep. Frank Wolf (R-Va.), who chairs the House appropriations subcommittee that funds the agency. Wolf, who is retiring from Congress, gave the DEA a boost it didn't ask for on his way out the door.



In a House appropriations subcommittee hearing last month, Leonhart said the agency was "on track" after a hiring freeze and would add agents graduating from three training academy sessions this year. Wolf asked whether she could use additional funds, telling Leonhart he "would like to [help]" increase the budget. After consulting with an aide, Leonhart tossed out a $175 million figure that would allow the DEA to expand, saying the agency was only hiring one agent for every two who retired or left.



On the House floor on Thursday, Wolf suggested that House members questioning the DEA budget sent the wrong message to a hypothetical DEA agent watching on C-SPAN in Afghanistan. Wolf also gave personal support to Leonhart, saying she "has given her life to law enforcement for the last 30 years."



"I think she's represented the DEA well," Wolf said. He previously defended Leonhart in a letter to her boss, Attorney General Eric Holder, after HuffPost reported that Holder had asked Leonhart to clarify a previous statement that seemed to be out of line with the administration on sentencing reform.



"I think there's been an effort by some in the administration to attack her in a way, it almost reminds me of the Nixon administration," Wolf said Thursday. "I was in the Nixon administration, they had policies whereby they would go after civil servants and career people."



The House is likely to vote on three other amendments Thursday night, including those that would prohibit the DEA from spending money to arrest state-licensed medical marijuana patients and providers, and to block states from importing hemp seeds for industrial hemp research programs made legal in the latest federal farm bill.



from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1k5Z49z

via IFTTT

Deputies Knew About Santa Barara Killer's Videos During Check

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office deputies checking on Elliot Rodger three weeks before he killed six college students were aware of, but didn't view, disturbing videos that prompted calls about his well-being, the agency disclosed Thursday.



A statement from the sheriff's office provides new details on the sequence of events during that pivotal visit, a time when Rodger was planning the rampage that would also leave 13 wounded. The guns he would use in the killings were stashed inside his apartment at the time. The office was not aware of and did not receive his manifesto and final video, in which he details plans to kill people, until an hour after the shooting, the statement said.



On April 30, four deputies, a police officer and a dispatcher in training were sent to Rodger's apartment after being informed by the county's mental health hotline that Rodger's therapist and mother were concerned about videos he posted online.



The visit lasted about 10 minutes, during which officers found him shy and polite. The deputies questioned him about what the statement described as "disturbing" videos, but Rodger told them he was having trouble fitting in socially and the videos were "merely a way of expressing himself," the statement said.



Because the deputies concluded he was not a threat to himself or others, they never viewed the videos.



That sequence of events is different from a statement Sunday from spokeswoman Kelly Hoover, who said "the sheriff's office was not aware of any videos until after the shooting rampage occurred."



In a typical mental health check, only two deputies would be dispatched. But deputies who were familiar with Rodger as a victim in a January petty theft case also went to his apartment.



from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1k5XLHC

via IFTTT

Army of One

The world withheld love and he went to war. He was an army of one -- another army of one, laying out his plans in secret torment, plotting his "day of retribution."



"The rampage shooters see themselves as moralistic punishers striking against deep injustice," Peter Turchin wrote a year and a half ago, in the wake of the Sandy Hook massacre. In his essay, ominously titled "Canaries in a Coal Mine," which was published at Social Evolution Forum, he notes the upward trajectory of mass murders. Since the '60s, they've increased more than tenfold. Something's going wrong in the world we've created.



The killers are always described as loners . . . monsters, psychopaths. They're not like us, and so the motives for the killings are sought only in the rubble of their lives -- in the left-behind writings and YouTube videos, the psychological reports, the fragmentary reflections of acquaintances -- and they're nothing more than sterile curiosities, with a sort of reality-TV entertainment value.



So it turns out that Elliot Rodger, the 22-year-old who killed six UC Santa Barbara students, then committed suicide, last week in Isla Vista, Calif., was shut out of human connection, nailed into a coffin of isolation. He wrote in his journal some years earlier:



"I was desperate to have the life I know I deserve; a life of being wanted by attractive girls, a life of sex and love. Other men are able to have such a life . . . so why not me? I deserve it! I am magnificent, no matter how much the world treated me otherwise. I am destined for great things."



Unlike most lonely people -- but like all the others who make screaming headlines out of their loneliness -- he sought a military solution to his troubles. His enemies were wrecking his life, so he armed himself and went after them. He "went to war" and, in so doing, dignified his predicament and justified his course of action. Calling it "war" is a nearly airtight justification for violence -- for murder.



The distinguishing characteristic of mass murder -- the coolly impersonal killing of strangers -- is not that the victims are random, but that they are in some way symbolic of the imagined "deep wrong" the killer wants to eradicate. The victims Elliot Rodger sought, after first stabbing to death two roommates and a visitor in his apartment, were the members of a local sorority: symbols of the women who had rejected him all his life. When he couldn't get into the building, he started shooting at people in the vicinity, who were all college students.



In his essay, Turchin described the "principle of social substitutability": seeing a particular organization, institution, race, nationality, community -- or whatever -- as a threat to one's well-being and, therefore, holding anyone associated with that organization as part of the malevolent "other," thus requiring extermination. This is what mass murder is. This is what terrorism is. This is what war is.



"On the battlefield," Turchin wrote, "you are supposed to try to kill a person whom you've never met before. You are not trying to kill this particular person, you are shooting because he is wearing the enemy uniform. It could easily be any other individual, but as long as they wear the same uniform, you would be shooting at them. Enemy soldiers are socially substitutable. As they say in gangster movies, 'nothing personal, just business.'"



The point of all this is that it's time to stop calling mass murderers "loners," even though that's what they no doubt call themselves. It's time to stop seeing them in isolation from the larger society -- our society -- of which they are a part, whether they know it or not. It's time to acknowledge and begin examining the complex interconnectedness of good and evil, right and wrong. It's time to reach for a deeper wisdom with which to understand, and begin healing, our intensifying social problems.



"Driven by the forces of love," Pierre Teilhard de Chardin wrote at the dawn of World War II, "the fragments of the world seek each other so that the world may come into being."



Something has gone wrong. The fragments of the world are turning on each other. They're killing each other.



The killings in Isla Vista took place just before Memorial Day, a day of notorious short-sightedness about whom and what we're supposed to remember. The convention of remembering "the sacrifice of our troops" requires us to maintain remembrance, as well, of a perpetually lurking enemy from whom we were protected. Subbing for enemies of the past, who are now (perhaps) our allies, are the enemies of the future.



It might just as well be called Social Substitutability Day, unless we deepen and widen its meaning and allow the day's remembrance to include the crimes against humanity every side in war commits -- unless we remember that militarism, like racism and misogyny, are the real enemies.



"The definition and practice of war and the definition and practice of mass murder," I wrote last year, "have eerie congruencies. We divide and slice the human race; some people become the enemy, not in a personal but merely an abstract sense -- 'them' -- and we lavish a staggering amount of our wealth and creativity on devising ways to kill them. When we call it war, it's as familiar and wholesome as apple pie. When we call it mass murder, it's not so nice."



And armies of millions beget armies of one.



- - -

Robert Koehler is an award-winning, Chicago-based journalist and nationally syndicated writer. His book, Courage Grows Strong at the Wound (Xenos Press), is still available. Contact him at koehlercw@gmail.com or visit his website at commonwonders.com.



from Chicago - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1mNk43z

via IFTTT